Archive | Indian Law RSS feed for this section

Delhi gang rape accused Ram Singh makes mockery of Tihar Jail

12 Mar

Ram Singh - Delhi accused in Delhi gang-rapeRam Singh, the prime accused in the Dec 16, 2012 Delhi gang-rape case, who was the driver of the bus in which six men committed the horrific assault on 23-year-old student Nirbhaya (not her real name), committed suicide in the wee hours on March 11,  2013 in jail number 3 of India’s most reputed and highly secured Tihar Jail. The sudden suicide of Ram Singh will surely bring a new twist in the legal hearing of the rape case as Ram Singh might have died with several key statements which could have helped the blind judicial system of India in deciding the magnitude of crime penalty for the remaining five accused.

Mange Lal Singh and Ram Bai, father and mother of Ram Singh

Mange Lal Singh and Ram Bai, father and mother of Ram Singh

According to the Tihar Jail authorities Ram Singh used a portion of the sleeping mat and a bucket to reach the jail grill which was about 8 feet high to hang himself to death. The funny part of the suicide was that Ram Singh was not alone in his cell, he was accompanied by three other sleeping inmates and a police guard outside his cell, ironically nobody came to know about it. Unfortunately no CCTV was installed around Ram Singh’s cell so the investigation team will now have to go by the words of inmates and sleeping officials, most likely Ram Singh’s sudden death might remain a secret forever. Ram Singh’s father, Mange Lal Singh who visited his son four days ago said his son appeared fine and gave no hints of taking his own life. Mange Lal also accused the fellow inmates and security guards of raping and threatening his son repeatedly.

The big question Indians need an answer to is how in the world there was such a big lapse in the security system of India’s most reputed Tihar jail. Is it that easy for a prisoner to commit suicide in a jail? for a moment lets imagine Ram Singh as a prime accused in some India’s major scandals such as CWG or Coalgate whose one statement could have shattered the life of many high profile ministers and bureaucrats, wouldn’t his sudden suicide in our hypothetical scenario could have saved many accused who would have raised a toast to celebrate his death. Death of Ram Singh raises serious questions on the policing system of our country. This is just one  such incident which came to limelight as the Delhi rape case went on and become a global phenomenon, God only knows how many of such deliberate incidents might have happened(or happening) across different Jails in India to save the so called netas/ministers of our country.

Tihar Jail - New Delhi

Tihar Jail – New Delhi

Now that Ram Singh is dead and his file is closed for good, he would be no more discussed in the court proceedings, but he has surely become the most discussed topic on internet. Whether he was killed or committed suicide, most probably it will forever remain an unsolved mystery. We people of India along with Nirbhay’s family would have loved to see him hanged in public, unfortunately this will never happen, and the only good thing about his death was that it has exposed the enormous security failure at one of India’s best-known prisons. Let’s wait and watch what new excuse our India government comes up with to wash this shameful black spot on the security system of our country.

What is Indian police good at?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Suryanelli rape case: 111 people booked for sharing comments on Facebook

27 Feb

Bindu Krishna-PJ Kurien-K SudhakaranIn yet another sad incident of so called moral policing, the Kerala police have registered a case under IT Act on a complaint that ‘abusive’ comments have been posted on Facebook against the state Mahila Congress chief  Bindu Krishna for backing Rajya Sabha deputy chairman P.J .Kurien in the Suryanelli rape case. Bindu Krishna filed a complaint saying that abusive comments, along with her picture, had been posted on Facebook after which a case under Section 66A of the Information and Technology Act had been imposed on Facebook users.

Police has filed a case against a man who posted a defamatory comment and the others for sharing the post. Around 120 persons were interrogated by police in Thiruvananthapuram and surrounding areas for posting obscene posts against Bindu Krishna on Facebook. So far Kerala police have booked a case against 111 people for posting derogatory remarks on Rajya Sabha Deputy Chairman PJ Kurien, the accused in the Suryanelli rape case.

Just a few days ago on February 16, 2013, K Sudhakaran a Lok Sabha Congress MP from Kannur, Kerala made dirty comments about the girl victim of the Suryanelli rape case. During a press conference in Muscat K Sudhakaran said the Suryanelli rape case victim who was allegedly raped by 42 men over 40 days in 1996, when she was 16 had carried out “outright prostitution”. Bindu Krishna reacted to the statement by saying “He should withdraw his statement and tender an apology”. K Sudhakaran apologizes for his comments and easily got away with the bold statement of referring a rape victim as a prostitute, whereas the common people of India are facing the sword of politician made law just for sharing and commenting on this whole issue.

Why in the world K Sudhakaran was let away for passing bad comments about a rape victim and the common people of India are being punished? The Kerala Government said they do not agree with Sudhakaran’s view, but could not take legal steps as he made the statement in Muscat. What a reason for not booking a minister! If government thinks people have committed a crime so has K Sudhakaran. Isn’t the law equal for everyone? The way things are going in our country, very soon there will separate jails built for Facebook users who comment or share anything against the government. One thing these politicians need to understand is that they should know how to handle criticism by common people of India, if the police of our country go with the politicians complaints of defamatory remarks, the day will not be far when whole of the country will be booked for sharing some kind of comments against some politician.

If these politicians are really true then why shall they worry about the comments, in fact they create more shame for themselves by using the IT act against the people of India. Let’s hope that coming years will give enough common sense to our so called leaders on how to face criticism on Facebook, Twitter and other social media properties on internet. The internet users in India are growing every second and their freedom of speech just can’t be killed by the hands of these politicians who are elected only by the people of India.

Do you agree with Government's decision of booking 111 Facebook users?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

When Indian cops turn rapist

25 Feb

Indian cops protecting women - Image by lankaviews.comHere is an incident which further taints the image of our Indian police and their commitment towards prevention of crime against women in India. In Aldur, a village in Chikmagalur district of Karnataka, the Aldur police on February 16, 2013 arrested a woman in connection with a chain-snatching that took place in 2011. The women used to rob gold ornaments and sell them through an accomplice in Bangalore. Five policemen, including Sub Inspector (SI), a female assistant SI and three constables which included a female constable of the Aldur police station brought the women to Bangalore to recover items she was accused of having stolen and also to arrest a co-accused.

The male police staff was lodged in a room, while the accused and the two policewomen were lodged separately in another room. According to the complaint filed by the woman, the SI summoned her to his room and raped her. Later, two police constables also raped her. She said “We stayed at a lodge in Bangalore. The SI and two constables raped me and threatened me not to reveal the incident to others. The woman constable did not come to my rescue”.  She further added “They threatened to rape my 12-year-old daughter if I informed the judge about the incident. Though the judge asked me if I was harassed by the police, I could not say anything”.

The woman victim met the Chikmagalur Superintendent of Police N. Shashi Kumar and lodged a written complaint against the SI and the two constables. Pratap Reddy, Inspector-General of Police (Western Range), has suspended five police personnel, attached to Aldur police station, in connection with the alleged rape of a woman detained in a theft case. Those suspended are police sub-inspector K.R. Shivakumar, assistant sub-inspector Nandini Shetti, and constables Gururaj, K.B. Mahesh and Kruthika. The woman victim and the SI Shivakumar have undergone a medical test while the two constables Mahesh and Gururaj are said to be absconding. The IG, Mr. Pratap reddy said “we will take action based on the medical report and the report from the Forensic Science Laboratory”. It’s a shame that our Indian police even after the horrifying incident of Delhi gang rape case hasn’t learnt to respect women of our country.

Are Indian cops serious about protecting Women?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Markandey Katju: A former Supreme Court judge with short temper

22 Feb

Markandey Katju loosing his temper in an inteviewMarkandey Katju is the Chairman of Press Council of India and a former judge of the Supreme Court of India. The Press Council of India is one of the most important statutory bodies in India that governs the conduct of the print media. Katju recently wrote an article in a national daily against the Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi. Katju in his article said “The truth today is that Muslims in Gujarat are terrorized and afraid that if they speak out against the horrors of 2002 they may be attacked and victimized. In the whole of India, Muslims (who are over 200 million of the people of India) are solidly against Modi (though there are a handful of Muslims who for some reason disagree.” Katju further wrote: “It is said by his supporters that Modi has no hand in the killings of Muslims in 2002 and it is also said that he had not been found guilty by any court of law. I do not want to comment on our judiciary but I certainly do not buy the story that Modi had no hand in the events of 2002. He was the chief minister of Gujarat at that time, and the horrible events happened on a large scale in Gujarat. Can it be believed that he had no hand in the events of 2002? At least I find it impossible to believe it.”

Markandey Katju cartoonBefore we start bashing Katju for his remarks let us make it clear that is not a supporter of BJP or Congress or any political parties in India. We found Katju’s remarks on Modi too provocative to an extent that could disturb the communal harmony of our country. What in the world motivated Katju to comment on an even that happened twelve years ago, why was he silent so far? Is it because media is giving enough footage to Modi as a prime minister candidate for 2014? It really makes no sense for a chairman of press council of India speaking against any individual or a political party. His statement clearly divides our nation; it provokes our Muslim brothers to form a wrong opinion about a chief minister who has so far done fairly well for his state as compared to the others. The 2002 incident of Gujarat was a shameful event which was carried by the religious-goons or the anti-social elements of our society who in the name of religion can go to any extent.

Katju was also the former judge of Supreme Court, being retired from such a prestigious post; one would expect him to be more sensible towards sensitive cases like Gujrat-2002 case. Another wild nature of Katju came into limelight during his interview with a news channel India news. The interview proves his impatient nature and his tolerance level, with this kind of volatile nature one wonder what kind of judgments he might have passed during his tenure as the Supreme Court judge.

Here is Katju’s interview:

In December 2012, Katju in one of his remarks said ’90 per cent of Indians are fools’ but later on clarified by saying that it was meant to awaken people to the realities of social evils like casteism, communalism in the country. May God help India from people like Markandey Katju.

Did Katju deserved to be a Supreme Court judge?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

PJ Kurien: Latest addition to India’s list of shameful ministers

15 Feb

Indian women cartoon by Manoj KureelLadies and gentlemen please put your hands together and welcome yet another character of Indian politics who is about to add more shame to our largest democracy of the world, and this time it’s none other than the speaker of Rajya Sabha PJ Kurien who is accused of raping a minor Girl in Kerala. The Rajya Sabha is the upper house of the Indian parliament and has special powers to make laws in respect of any matter in the national interest. PJ Kurien is deputy chairman of the Rajya Sabha and takes care of the day-to-day matters of the house. It’s really sad and shocking for the people of India that a person like Kurien who holds such an important position in the Indian parliament is involved in such a horrifying case. So what is this case and how is Kuiren involved in this?

It started way back on January 16, 1996 when a 9th standard girl at Little Flower Convent School in Munnarwa, Kerala was abducted by a bus conductor. After the abduction, the victim was transferred to two others, one of whom a woman and the other a lawyer, victim was presented to the high and mighty in the state’s socio-political spectrum and raped by several persons, the girl was kept in illegal custody in various cities of Kerala and was sexually harassed for one month before she was set free on February 26, 1996. She was given a small amount of money and threatened for dire consequences if she told anyone about what had happened.  The case is known as the Suryanelli rape case, Suryanelli is a village in the backward district of Idukki in Kerala.

On March 28, 1996 the girl’s father submitted a petition to then chief minister AK Antony with a submission by the victim that she had identified from a photo in the Mathrubhumi (Malayalam language newspaper) that one of the assailants was former Union Minister PJ Kurien, who was called Baaji in the testimony. No evidence was found against Kurien and it was opined that Kurien could not have visited the girl at Kumily rest house during the time mentioned by her. Worst part was that Kurien was never interrogated by police in spite of victims’ complaint. However, the victim’s father filed a private complaint in the court of the first class magistrate at Peerumedu, with Kurien as a prime accused. Two witnesses confirmed that they had seen Kurian at the Kumily house during the days as alleged by the victim. In May 1999, the Peerumade first class judicial magistrate court had issued a direction to file a charge sheet against Kurian on the basis of a private complaint filed by the victim, but using influence at the Centre, Kurian managed to get an injunction from the Supreme Court against this indictment. In 1999, under public pressure, the government set up the State’s first-ever Special Court to try a case of sexual assault. A serious inquiry conducted by a team led by Inspector-General of Police Sibi Mathew bringing the culprits to book. On September 6, 2000, the Special Court sentenced 35 persons to rigorous imprisonment for varying terms. Kerala High Court refused to include Kurien as a defendant on April 4, 2007 for the lack of evidence. The worst part was that High Court even declared that the victim was a willing partner. Supreme Court of India dismissed a petition filed by Kerala Government challenging the High Court’s refusal to charge P J Kurien.

PJ KurienOn Jan 31, 2013, the Supreme Court set aside a Kerala High Court verdict acquitting 35 men accused of rape. The Supreme Court also expressed shock over the findings of the high court that the victim was a willing partner. According to the apex court, the high court did not look at the evidence properly and directed that the case be re-judged again within six month.  An interesting turn came to the Suryanelli case on February 11, 2013 when Dharmarajan, the convict who is absconding after obtaining bail, told a television channel that Sibi Mathews, who headed the special investigation team, had pressured him not to mention about Kurien’s alleged involvement in the case. Dharmarjan, who was charged with taking the girl to several places for 40 days between January and February in 1996 and sentenced to five years by the High Court, said that Kurien was spared the identification parade conducted as part of investigations.  He told Mathrubhumi News from an undisclosed place in Karnataka “I took Kurien in my Ambassador car to the Kumily Guest house, Why should I lie on that, I am ready to swear by my deceased father”

Suryanelli case is yet another example of how our Indian politicians exploit the laws of the land to their personal benefits, the funny part is that after such shameful allegations these people still dare to be in politics and become part of the parliamentary system which defines new laws for the country. How can a person like Kurien with such an allegation are even allowed to enter our parliament?

Should PJ Kurien resign immediately?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Justice Verma Committee Report: Recommending action or giving Gyan

24 Jan

Verma Committee report after Delhi Gang Rape

Justice J. S. Verma (centre) with Justice Leila Seth (left) and Gopal Subramaniam

Justice Verma committee, a three member committee headed by Justice JS Verma(former chief justice of India) was formed after the brutal gang rape of a 23 year old women in Delhi to suggest the amendments to laws relating to crime against women. The committee after its formation had issued a notice seeking suggestions from the public by email or fax, the deadline of submitting such suggestions was set to 5th January 2013.The committee was given a deadline of 30 days to submit their report, a 631-page report was finalized in 29 days and was submitted on January 23, 2013 to the home ministry of India.

According to Mr. Verma, the committee received 80,000 suggestions from Indians, women activists and students from all over the world. Now coming to the point of how effective the Verma committee report is, first of all does it sound real that it took only 29 days to review 80,000 suggestions and come up with a final 631-page report. Surely Mr Verma a 79 year old and the other two members in the committee, Leila Seth-82 years and Gopal Subramaniam-54 years must have worked like super computers to have come up with 631-page report in just 29 days to challenge the current weak laws pertaining to crime against women in India. The Verma Committee, which was constituted by the Indian government, a move to calm down the Indian police and rape victims in India cartoonprotesters on the streets, has again failed to address one basic problem which is amending the current laws on crime against women to an extent that no Tom, Dick or Harry on the streets of India even dare to think about committing any type of crime against women. The Verma committee suggestions are more like gyan or best practices or a roadmap which in some form are already part of the current judicial system. The Verma committee in their report have only suggested and preached the obvious things which we all agree to and no major steps have been taken to create a state of fear in the mind of criminals or future criminals.

Here are key highlights of the report:

No alteration of the legally defined age of juvenile from 18 to 16 years.
- A key demand by Indians after one of the accused involved in the Delhi gang-rape was found to be below 18 years.

Whoever commits the offence of rape shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term not less than seven years but may extend to imprisonment for life.
- Why not death sentence?

Gang-rape will entail a punishment of not less than 20 years, which also may extend to life.
- Why not death sentence?

Gang-rape followed by death shall be punished with life imprisonment.
- Why not death sentence?

MPs facing criminal charges should vacate their seats to honor the Parliament.
- Why not they be barred from politics completely?

Acid attacks would be punished by up to seven years.
- Just seven years for spoiling someone’s life?

A separate Bill of Rights for women that entitles a woman a life of dignity and security.
- Verma Committee’s gyan.

Punishment for causing death or a persistent vegetative state shall be given rigorous imprisonment for a term not less than 20 years but may be for life also.
- Why not death sentence?

Establish a new constitutional authority similar to CAG for education and non-discrimination of women and children for proper audit of laws.
- Creating another category of police, will it help?

Increase the strength of judges without affecting the quality.
- Whole India knows this since long, nothing new.

Implement police reforms for better autonomy and functioning of the police force.
- Whole India knows this since long, nothing new.

Government must tackle trafficking of children and maintain data on the same.
- Shame on Indian Government/Police if it’s currently not happening.

Make sure that law enforcement agencies do not become tools at the hands of political masters.
- Whole India knows this since long, nothing new.

Bring transparency and accountability to the functioning of all institutions of governance.
- Whole India knows this since long, nothing new.

The ambiguity on who is responsible for the law and order issues in Delhi should be removed with an immediate effect.
- Delhi state government vs. central government issue, a long known fact to fool Delhi people.

All marriages should be registered. Magistrate should ensure that no dowry is taken.
- Verma Committee’s gyan.

Any officer who fails to report a case of rape or delays the same should be punished.
- Shame on Indian Government/Police if it’s currently not happening.

The committee has framed a protocol for medical examination of rape victim. The same should be followed.
- Addresses how to handle a rape case rather than preventing rape.

Sexual violence against women perpetrated by armed forces should be brought under the purview of ordinary law.
- Shame on Indian Government/Police if it’s currently not happening.

Will Verma Committee suggestions help prevent crime against women in India?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Shocking Revelations from Delhi Gang Rape victim’s friend – The lone witness

5 Jan

Amanat / Damini / Nirbhaya’s friend - Delhi Gang rape victim's friend

“I wish I could have saved her”

On January 4, 2013 the first ever interview of Delhi gang rape victim’s friend who is the only witness in the shameful case was aired on Zee News. The channel identified victim’s friend as Avaindra Pratap Pandey. The ever smart Delhi police, without wasting anytime have filed a case against Zee News channel on the same telecast day of the interview. The police have charged Zee News for revealing the identity of rape victim by carrying an interview of her friend. We wish police had shown the same smartness on the incident day by at least sending the pleading victim quickly to a nearby hospital. Who knows her life might have been saved.

Here are some statements/facts by the friend of the rape victim:

1. He said no one came to help after they were thrown off the bus.

2. After the police arrived, it took over two hours to reach the hospital.

3. He said that the six accused had invited them for boarding the bus.

4. “They beat us up, hit us with an iron rod, snatched our clothes and belongings and threw us off the bus on a deserted stretch”

5. Apart from the driver and the helper, others behaved like they were passengers.

6. The victim and her friend also paid Rs 20 as fare.

7. They started teasing the victim and it led to a brawl.

8. Victim’s friend beat three of them up but then the rest of them brought an iron rod and hit him before he fell unconscious.

9. They drove the bus around for nearly two and a half hours. Victim and her friend were shouting, trying to make people hear them, but they had switched off the lights of the bus.

10. Victim tried to dial the police number 100, but the accused snatched her mobile away.

11. Before throwing victim and her friend off the bus, they snatched their mobiles and tore off their clothes.

12. After throwing victim and her friend off the bus, they tried to mow them down.

13. Victim and her friend were without clothes. They tried to stop passers-by. Several auto rickshaws, cars and bikes slowed down but no one stopped for about 25 minutes.

14. Someone patrolling, stopped and called the police. Three PCR (Police control room) vans arrived after 45 minutes, but wasted time in deciding under which police station’s jurisdiction the case fell.

15. Nobody, including the police, gave them clothes or called an ambulance. After repeated requests, someone gave victim’s friend a part of a bed sheet to cover the victim.

16. Instead of taking them to a nearby hospital, police took them to a government hospital (Safdarjung) that was far away.

17. No one helped victim’s friend in carrying the victim into the PCR van “the policemen didn’t help us because my friend girl was bleeding profusely and they were probably worried about their clothes”.

18. At the hospital they were made to wait and literally had to beg for clothes. Victim’s friend asked on housekeeping person to provide some clothes to which he was asked to wait, but clothes never came.

19. Victim’s friend borrowed a stranger’s mobile and called his relatives. His treatment started only after his relatives came.

20. When victim’s friend met her in the hospital, she was smiling. She was able to write and it never felt that she did not want to live.

21. Victim’s friend came to know what had happened with her only after she gave the first statement to the lady SDM (sub-divisional magistrate).

22. Victim told the magistrate that the accused should not be hanged but burnt to death.

23. Victim was coughing and bleeding while giving the statement. There was no pressure or interference at all while giving the statement. It is wrong to say that the statement was made under pressure.

24. Victim’s friend said witnesses should not be harassed so that they can go to the court to testify.

25. Victim’s friend said lighting candles cannot change the mind-set of people. “You have to help people on the road when they need help”.

26. No one from the government has contacted victim’s friend so far to ask about his treatment. He has been paying for his own treatment.

27. Victim’s friend said “They (the people) had cars, they could have taken us to the hospital. Every minute was important for us. But they didn’t. Who will change this attitude?”

28. Victim’s friend said that if his friend was “treated in a better hospital, she would have probably been alive today”.

29. Victim’s friend said that one of the police officials wanted him to say that the police were doing a good job in the case.

30. Victim’s friend said he was in the police station for four days rather than being in a hospital.

Watch the interview of Amanat / Damini / Nirbhaya’s friend, the lone witness of the shameful incident:

Should the Police and we people be equally blamed for the shameful Delhi rape incident?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Akbaruddin Owaisi: Dividing India with his hatred speech

4 Jan

Akbaruddin Owaisi, politician or a terrorist? Image-pardaphash.comAkbaruddin Owaisi an MLA and floor leader of All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen(MIM) in the Andhra Pradesh Legislative Assembly gave a two-hour long inflammatory speech on December 24 2012, he was addressing a rally of twenty to twenty-five thousand Muslims in the Nirmal town of Adilabad district of Andhra Pradesh. On 28 December 2012, an Advocate K. Karunasagar filed a petition in a local court in Hyderabad against Akbaruddin Owaisi for hurting the sentiments of Hindus, and for making inflammatory, derogatory and offensive remarks. Karunasagar received three death threats on the night of filing the petition.

The speech definitely had clear remarks against Hindus, but for the sake of the integrity and unity of our country let us categorize this speech as against the humanity. Let’s not make Akbaruddin Owaisi the voice of Muslims as he wants to be portrayed, Muslims in India or anywhere around the world are not the supporters of terrorism so how can they support Akbaruddin Owaisi who in his speech appreciates the Mumbai bomb blasts and respects Ajmal Kasab. Akbaruddin Owaisi only represents evil which has no place in the world, he is not a Muslim or a Hindu, he just another Neta/Minister who is trying to divide India for his political motives by playing with the emotions of innocent Muslims.

It’s a shame that such self-proclaimed leaders are roaming freely in our country. Shame on the government of Andhra Pradesh that no immediate action was taken on Akbaruddin Owaisi whose provocative speech had the potential to create thousands of Ajmal Kasab on the streets of India. Director General of Police (DGP) V Dinesh Reddy blamed the Urdu speech for delay in action. He said “There may be slight delay in view of transcribing the speeches due to the language (Urdu) factor”. Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister N Kiran Kumar Reddy told reporters that the government had no role in the matter and it was for the police to take action as per the law. Sounds like the DGP or the Chief Minister are least bothered about what is going on in their state. It’s a shame that a chief minister like this has been given the charge to maintain law and peace in the state. Recently in Maharashtra two girls were arrested in less than 24 hours for a harmless Facebook post while this disgraceful Akbaruddin Owaisi who is currently in London is roaming free after his hatred public speech.

Here are some statements from Akbaruddin Owaisi’s hatred speech:
1. Supports Mumbai Bomb blasts by providing Babari Mosque demolition as the reason, terms the blasts as reaction to the action against Muslims.
2. Refers Ajmal Kasab as ‘Son’. Compares Kasab with Narendra Modi, asks for death penalty for Modi.
3. He says if the Muslims of India get united like Muslims of Andhra Pradesh, very soon Modi will be seen hanging.
4. He says if we Muslims leave this country we will take the Red Fort, Taj Mahal and Qutub Minar along and you Hindus will be left with the Ayodhya’s deserted Ram temple and naked statues of Ajanta and Ellora.
5. He says when Muslim dies they get buried in the land because they love the land and if Hindus die they are burnt and their ashes just disappear in air.
6. He says we Muslims are 25 crore and you Hindus are 100 crore, remove the police from streets for fifteen minutes and we will tell who is more powerful.
7. He refers Hindus as namard(impotent) and says even 1 crore impotent Hindus cannot create 1 person like Muslim.
8. He provokes the Muslims by asking them not to be afraid of police or anyone and motivates Muslims to take law in their hands if required.
9. He refers BJP as snake who can be killed by a thin stick. Refers the stick as ‘Namaz’ and ‘Quran’
10. He says, instead of microphone if he holds something else(weapon) in his hand, there will be bloodshed in India which India would have never seen like before.

Watch the hatred speech video of Akbaruddin Owaisi:

Should Akbaruddin Owaisi be banned from politics?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Indian Ministers: Arrogance of Power

3 Jan

Looks like the success of public elected Indian ministers goes into their head, they seem to lack their civic sense and think of themselves as the most superior and powerful herd of people in the Indian society. Here are examples of such minister and their deeds which reflect the arrogance of power displayed by them in public.

1. On December 28, 2012, Punjab health minister and senior BJP leader Madan Mohan Mittal lost his temper in public on not being received by the ADGP (Additional Director General of Police) Gurdev Singh Sahota during the inauguration of community health centre at the Punjab Armed Police (PAP) complex.

2. On December 2, 2012 Nitin Nikam, a corporator from Raj Thackeray’s Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) was caught on camera repeatedly slapping 65-year-old DG Patil (contractor) over alleged delay in repairing a damaged water pipeline.

3. Uttar Pradesh’s Urban Development Minister Mohammed Azam Khan on August 27, 2012 lost his cool and scolded IAS officer Vishnu Swaroop Misra, called him ‘badtameez(disrespectful person)’ during an official meeting.

4. Samajwadi Party MLA Irfan Solanki and his associates on June 15, 2011 went to the office of Kanpur Electricity Supply Company (KESCO) MD, Ritu Maheshwari, barged into her cabin and allegedly abused and misbehaved with her.

5. On Feb 8, 2011 Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Mayawati’s Personal Security Officer (PSO) Padam Singh, a retired police officer went beyond his call of duty as he wiped Mayawati’s dusty shoes with his handkerchief during her visit to the Auraiya district in UP.

6. Samajwadi Party supremo Mulayam Singh Yadav on March 23, 2009 allegedly threatened a senior lady official Ministhy Dileep (an IAS officer from Kerala) of Mainpuri district. He alleged the way in which Ministhy, the District Magistrate (who was also District Election Oficer) was cancelling arms licences.

Indian Ministers consider themselves above law?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Gopal Kanda’s shameless birthday celebration

2 Jan

Gopal Kanda in Jail - Cartoon by Kushal BhattacharyaWhile India has still not overcome the agony of Delhi gang rape, here is an incident which proves that ministers of India are really not serious about the crime against women of India. Gopal Goyal Kanda a former home minister of Haryana state who is currently in jail for harassing his airline’s former employee Geetika Sharma to an extent that she committed suicide, was praised shamelessly on his 47th birthday by group of ministers who gathered at the Tara Baba complex in Haryana for Kanda’s birthday celebrations. Haryana Minister for Labour and Employment Shiv Charan Sharma, Chief Parliamentary Secretary and Fatehabad MLA Prahalad Singh Gillankhera and Panipat MLA OP Jain along with a paid crowd of supporters, on December 29, 2012 joined together at a function to celebrate the birthday of former minister Gopal Kanda who is in jail for his alleged involvement in the suicide of former air hostess Geetika Sharma.

The three ministers who are supporting Bhupinder Singh Hooda government of Haryana praised Kanda at his 47th birthday ceremony. Shiv Charan Sharma, a congress leader categorized the Geetika Sharma case as a small one and supported Kanda by referring the dead victim as a servant mistakenly hired by Kanda. Sharma further said “His birthday is being celebrated in jail and in Delhi also. Gopal Kanda is always amongst us. He doesn’t get afraid of anything. He doesn’t fear anyone”. Sharma also referred Kanda as a brave and honest person who has been falsely accused by those who are jealous of his extra-ordinary growth in life.

Isn’t this a shame that a person who initially went underground before surrendering against police, is now been treated as hero by his colleague ministers. Really makes us sad for the people of Haryana who are being ruled by such insensitive and low grade ministers. Currently CBI is inquiring the Geetika Sharma suicide case and we are sure that in few months Gopal Kanda will be again out on streets, in public and free of all charges. When the ministers who contribute towards the law reforms of the country are themselves talking highly about the people like Kanda, who the whole India knows is corrupt and a womanizer, how can we assume that this country will change and will bring reforms in the life of Indian Women?

Ministers praising Gopal Kanda should be punished?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...